久久综合性,国产精品视频免费观看

內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介

　　《律師評(píng)價(jià)語(yǔ)言的社會(huì)符號(hào)學(xué)研究》從社會(huì)符號(hào)學(xué)視角入手，綜合韓禮德學(xué)派的話語(yǔ)分析模式與哈貝馬斯的主體間性，針對(duì)當(dāng)前司法改革中的實(shí)踐問(wèn)題：律師的法庭辯論語(yǔ)言進(jìn)行語(yǔ)言學(xué)體系構(gòu)建與理論解釋;在理性思辨的基礎(chǔ)上，依托實(shí)地采錄的法庭辯論語(yǔ)料庫(kù)，有效利用中西話語(yǔ)分析的研究成果，從宏觀到微觀深入分析了律師在辯論中如何發(fā)表評(píng)價(jià)性意見，揭示了貌似客觀的律師話語(yǔ)中所隱含的主觀性態(tài)度及表現(xiàn)形式，最終論證了律師理性辯論模式的適切性?！堵蓭熢u(píng)價(jià)語(yǔ)言的社會(huì)符號(hào)學(xué)研究》運(yùn)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)理論來(lái)探討法律交際領(lǐng)域中的具體問(wèn)題，具有跨學(xué)科研究性質(zhì)，涉及語(yǔ)言學(xué)、哲學(xué)、法學(xué)等學(xué)科知識(shí)，體現(xiàn)了應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)的社會(huì)實(shí)踐價(jià)值，因此不僅對(duì)法律語(yǔ)言學(xué)、話語(yǔ)分析、應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)等專業(yè)的研究人員與學(xué)生有啟發(fā)意義，對(duì)從事司法實(shí)踐或研究法學(xué)文化的學(xué)者或?qū)W生也有實(shí)踐參考價(jià)值，也合適做英語(yǔ)、法律愛好者的閱讀材料。

作者簡(jiǎn)介

　　張麗萍，女，生于1973年11月1日，山西和順人，南京理工大學(xué)外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院教師，副教授，碩士生導(dǎo)師，廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)博士，法律語(yǔ)言學(xué)方向首批博士生。迄今為止，已發(fā)表各類法律語(yǔ)言學(xué)論文十余篇（其中CSSCl四篇），參加國(guó)際學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議一次，主持或參與省廳／部級(jí)科研項(xiàng)目10項(xiàng)，參與校精品課程建設(shè)3項(xiàng)，承擔(dān)或參與校教改項(xiàng)目2項(xiàng)，參與教材編撰2部。

圖書目錄

1 Introduction
1.1 Research orientation
1.2 Working definition
1.3 Rationale for this study
1.4 0bjective and research questions
1.4.1 General objective
1.4.2 Specific research questions
1.5 Significance of this study
1.6 Research methodology and data collection
1.6.1 Research methodology
1.6.2 Data collection and description
1.7 0rganization of this book
2 Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
2.2 The construct of lawyer evaluation
2.2.1 The origin of lawyer evaluation
2.2.2 The constituents of lawyer evaluation
2.3 Lawyer evaluation and context
2.4 Lawyer evaluation in context:a linguistic perspective
2.4.1 Lawyer evaluation identified in discourse
2.4.2 Two dimensions for the positioning of lawyer evaluation
2.4.3 Lawyer evaluation on the dimension of solidarity
2.5 Lawyer evaluation in context:a legal perspective
2.5.1 Major issues for lawyer evaluation
2.5.2 Predominant legal ideology
2.5.3 Habermasian interpretations of judicial communication
2.6 Summary
3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Lawyer evaluation, context and the dispute resolution
3.2.1Socio-semiotic view of language
3.2.2 Constituents of lawyer evaluation
3.2.3 Legal contexts as determinants
3.2.4 The presentation of lawyer evaluation
3.2.5 Functions of lawyer evaluation in the trial
3.3 The theoretical framework
3.4 Summary
4 The Constituents of Lawyer Evaluation
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Lawyer evaluation as Affect
4.3 Lawyer evaluation as Judgement
4.3.1 Social Esteem
4.3.2 Social Sanction
4.3.3 Social Punishment
4.4 Lawyer evaluation as Appreciation
4.4.1 Reaction
4.4.2 Composition
4.4.3　 Valuation
4.5 Summary
5 Lawyer Evaluation under Contextual Constraints
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Lawyer evaluation under constraints from the situational context
5.2.1 The situational context and its constraints
5.2.2 Lawyer evaluation in confrontation
5.3 Lawyer evaluation under the situation of culture
5.3.1Habermasian law and rational confrontation
5.3.2 Lawyer evaluation in rational confrontation
5.4 Summary
……
6 Discursive Construction of Rational Lawyer Evaluation
7 Functions of Lawyer Evaluation
8 Conclusion
APPENDICES
REFERENCES